EIA Examines Use Of Solar Trackers Among U.S. Projects

More than 50% of the operating utility-scale solar photovoltaic (PV) systems in the U.S. use some form of tracking technology, and those systems tend to be located in the Southwest, where solar resources are more favorable, according to a new analysis from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA).

As the EIA explains, the electricity generated by a solar PV system depends on the orientation and tilt of the PV panels and, in some cases, its ability to track the sun throughout the day. Because photovoltaic panels operate more efficiently when oriented directly at the sun, some systems use solar-tracking technology to increase electricity generation by rotating the panels along one or two axes.

The EIA says its annual survey of electric generators captures detailed technology information about the nation’s power plants; the most recent report provides information as of the end of 2015. EIA’s monthly survey provides more recent, but less detailed, information on utility-scale power plants. Since the end of 2015, another 6.5 GW of solar PV capacity has been added, based on data through January 2017, according to the EIA.

The agency says because of the cost of solar-tracking units and the differences in weather and solar insolation (exposure to the sun) across the U.S., solar-tracking units may not be the most economic choice for producers in some regions. In fact, the EIA says fixed-tilt solar PV units accounted for 80%, or 2,468 MW of capacity, of all utility-scale solar PV units operating in 2015 in the eastern U.S. (i.e., east of the Mississippi River).

In states west of the Mississippi River, fixed-tilt solar PV units accounted for just 37% (3,904 MW) of total solar PV unit capacity in 2015, and single-axis solar PV units accounted for 56%. In comparison, single-axis units in the eastern region accounted for just 19% of solar PV capacity in the eastern U.S.

The EIA says the benefits of solar-tracking technologies depend on the amount and type of solar radiation. The two major types of solar radiation are direct-beam radiation and diffuse radiation. Direct-beam radiation comes from the sun to the earth in a straight line, whereas diffuse radiation is light that has been scattered by the earth’s atmosphere and strikes the earth’s surface in many different directions, the agency explains.

Solar-tracking technologies that follow the path of the sun across the sky are effective at capturing direct radiation because they can be aimed directly toward the sun. However, the EIA says these tracking technologies have no benefit when capturing diffuse radiation because diffuse radiation is not concentrated in a certain trackable direction. The eastern U.S. has more average yearly cloud coverage than the western U.S. As a result, the EIA continues, the east receives higher proportions of diffuse radiation, reducing the benefits of tracking technologies and leading to a higher percentage of fixed-tilt solar panels. In the western U.S., which receives more direct solar radiation, single-axis PV panels track the sun’s path from east to west, thus capturing more direct radiation than a fixed-axis unit.

Financial considerations also affect the choice between fixed-tilt mounting and the use of solar-tracking technology, the EIA adds. Fixed-tilt units are cheaper to install than solar panels with tracking technology. Single- and dual-axis tracking units require additional acreage to install, and the tracking systems themselves are more expensive. However, the agency says tracking systems, while more expensive, can produce more electricity. For example, the PVWatts calculator developed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory estimates that, over the course of a year, a 10 kW PV system in Los Angeles, using a single-axis tracking system will produce 21% more electricity than a system tilted at a fixed 20 degrees. A dual-axis tracking system in the same location would produce 31% more than the fixed-tilt system.

For an outlook on the global PV tracker market and to learn which companies ranked as the top 10 global suppliers in 2016, click here.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here